Claude 4 Sonnet vs Opus: Feature & Benchmark Comparison

Claude 4 Sonnet vs Opus: Feature & Benchmark Comparison

Comparison chart of Claude Sonnet 4 vs Claude Opus 4 features
Figure 1: Feature comparison of Claude Sonnet 4 and Claude Opus 4

Anthropic’s Claude 4 ships in two editions—Sonnet 4 (free-tier generalist) and Opus 4 (paid, reasoning-focused). In this in-depth guide, you’ll find:

  • A clear breakdown of each model’s core features
  • Hands-on test results (math challenges & coding tasks)
  • A consolidated benchmarks table
  • Step-by-step access instructions (web & API)

📌 Why Claude 4 Matters

With new AI models emerging every month, Claude 4 stands out thanks to its 200 K-token context window and two distinct modes:

  • Sonnet 4: ideal for everyday chat, Q&A, document summarization, and light coding
  • Opus 4: built for deep reasoning, agentic workflows, and large-scale code refactors

Both often outperform GPT-4.1 and Gemini 2.5 Pro on key coding and reasoning benchmarks.


🔎 Claude 4 Sonnet 4: The Free All-Rounder

Use Cases

  • Real-time chat and Q&A
  • Summarizing long documents (up to 200 K tokens)
  • Small-scale code snippets and data analysis

Key Specs

  • Context window: 200 000 tokens
  • Max output: 64 000 tokens
  • Availability: Free tier for all users

“Sonnet 4 delivers shockingly robust performance for a free model—great for multi-step tutorials and code examples.”

Top Features

  • Faster and more reliable than Sonnet 3.7
  • Maintains context across long sessions
  • Generates detailed plans with up to 64 K tokens

Figure 1: Feature & benchmark comparison chart


🌟 Claude 4 Opus 4: The High-Reasoning Flagship

Use Cases

  • Agentic search and tool integration
  • Large-scale code refactoring (> 200 lines)
  • Multi-step problem solving and planning

Key Specs

  • Context window: 200 000 tokens
  • Modes: Fast chat + “Extended Thinking” for deliberate reasoning
  • Availability: Pro/Max/Team/Enterprise plans

“Opus 4 works like a senior engineer in your IDE—its multi-step refactors are next-level.”

Highlights

  • Tops SWE-bench Verified at 79.4 % (high-compute mode)
  • Excels on TerminalBench (43.2 %) and GPQA Diamond (83.3 %)
  • Seamlessly switches between quick replies and in-depth analysis

🛠 Hands-On Tests: Math & Coding

1. Math Challenge

  • Task: Tricky arithmetic + tool use
  • Sonnet 4: Initial error, then writes a JavaScript snippet and solves correctly
  • Opus 4: Correct on the first attempt

2. Permutation Puzzle

“Use all digits 0–9 exactly once to form x + y = z.”

  • Sonnet 4: Brute-force, hits token limit, then gracefully refuses to hallucinate
  • Opus 4: Instant correct answer: 246 + 789 = 1035

3. Coding Task (p5.js Endless Runner)

  • Prompt: Pixelated dinosaur theme, start screen + instructions
  • Opus 4 Result: Clean start screen, then fixes trailing-pixel bug—playable prototype

📊 Claude 4 Benchmarks Overview

BenchmarkSonnet 4 (%)Opus 4 (%)GPT-4.1 (%)Gemini 2.5 Pro (%)
SWE-bench Verified72.772.554.663.2
TerminalBench (CLI)35.543.230.325.3
GPQA Diamond75.479.680.279.8
MMLU (multilingual QA)86.588.889.187.7
MMMU (visual reasoning)74.476.578.277.3
AIME (math comp.)70.575.585.082.4

Source: Anthropic, May 2025


🚀 How to Access Claude 4

Web & Chat

  • Claude.ai (Web • iOS • Android)
    • Sonnet 4: Free for all
    • Opus 4: Paid plans (Pro/Max/Team/Enterprise)

API & Cloud Services

  • Anthropic API
  • Amazon Bedrock
  • Google Cloud Vertex AI
ModelInput CostOutput Cost
Sonnet 4$3 / 1M tokens$15 / 1M tokens
Opus 4$15 / 1M tokens$75 / 1M tokens

Batching & caching can cut costs by up to 90 %.


🔚 Conclusion

  • Claude 4 Sonnet – best free choice for chat, summarization, and light coding.
  • Claude 4 Opus – top pick for deep reasoning, agentic workflows, and extensive refactors.

Start with Sonnet 4 for everyday tasks and upgrade to Opus 4 as your complexity grows.


Internal Links:

External Link:


Enjoyed this breakdown? Subscribe to The Median for weekly AI insights!

o4-mini

You have not enough Humanizer words left. Upgrade your Surfer plan.

Comments

No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *